In
spite of the legions of Planned Parenthood and "Christian"
"pro-life" nay-sayers, backstabbers, and backbiters who cry
crocodile tears about the "right to privacy" of people who
butcher God's children, Public Shame is proving to be a real deterrence
to abortion. http://www.abortioncams.com
is proving it every day that passes.
I apologize for not keeping you better informed about what is happening
on this front in the Abortion War. Over the past two weeks we were
besieged with attacks on our Internet servers. We went through four
Internet Service Providers in that period, but we were offline only two
days total. That proves our Internet communication lines are
sufficiently redundant to withstand just about any foreseeable attacks
in the future. As many of you are doing, when you visit either www.christiangallery.com
or www.abortioncams.com and
notice anything amiss, please report it to us so we can deal with the
attack immediately.
We have been getting so many attacks because www.abortioncams.com
has been spotlighted on national television on three occasions in the
last three weeks, and has been the subject of numerous magazine and
newspaper articles. As a direct result of this national publicity,
literally hundreds of thousands of people are passing through the Web
site on a weekly basis.
Following is a transcript of a recent CNN broadcast on a program that
focuses on legal questions before the American people.
In Christ Jesus, the King of kings,
Neal Horsley,
http://www.abortioncams.com
CNN: THE POINT
WITH GRETA VAN SUSTEREN
Abortion: Getting the Picture
Aired: June 26, 2001 - 20:30 ET
This is a rush transcript and may have innacuracies.
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
ANNOUNCER: THE POINT
with Greta Van Susteren.
Who is supporting, performing, or even getting abortions in your state?
His Web site puts their pictures on the Internet.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: We are making a record, a data base of people who are
actually involved in slaughtering babies.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
ANNOUNCER: Is this free speech in action? Or a disaster waiting to
happen?
Tonight's POINT: "Abortion -- getting the picture."
The Supreme Court's summer recess is just around the corner. So it's
time to look ahead at what cases, and whose faces may be there in the
fall.
Now from Washington, Greta Van Susteren.
GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, HOST: What do you think about abortion? If you
support a woman's right to choose, how do you feel about anti- abortion
activists posting your name, address and even your picture on the World
Wide Web?
If you are on the other side, and believe abortion is murder, what would
you do if you could find the names, addresses, and now, the faces of
people in your town who support, provide or have gotten abortions? These
are not hypothetical questions. It is all as close as your computer.
Tonight's "Flashpoint": "Abortion -- getting the picture."
Here's David Mattingly to show us where.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
DAVID MATTINGLY, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): All it takes is an
Internet connection, a Web browser, and a few mouse clicks to find the
controversial Nuremberg files posted by the online anti-abortion
activist Neal Horsley.
NEAL HORSLEY, WEB SITE CREATOR: The thing the Nuremberg file's Web site
is doing is reminding people that doctors who kill babies, even if it's
authorized by the Supreme Court might find themselves on trial someday,
in the same way that the Nazis found themselves on trial in Nuremberg.
MATTINGLY: The site lists names of abortion providers: doctors, clinic
owners, administrators. It came under intense scrutiny in October 1998
following the murder of New York obstetrician Barnett Slepian. Slepian
was killed by a sniper's bullet through the window of his home.
Afterward, Slepian's name appeared on the Nuremberg list with a line
through it crossed off by Horsley.
HORSLEY: We don't want to see anybody die, but the fact is 3,000 babies
are going to die today, and that fact has been ignored for the last 25
years.
MATTINGLY: But critics labeled the site a "hit list." Other
names crossed off include John Britton, murdered in 1994 by anti-
abortion activist Paul Hill; David Gunn, also murdered in Pensacola in
1993. Some names appear in gray: Canadian doctors Garson Romalis and
Hugh Short, each wounded in separate attacks by snipers.
Also on the list, abortion patients who have died, some of those cases
dating back to the 1970s. Horsley's site was scrutinized again in 1999
after an Oregon jury handed down a $107 million verdict against
anti-abortion activists. The activists created wanted posters of
abortion doctors. The doctors argued they were being targeted for
violence. Horsley was called to testify on behalf of the defense.
HORSLEY: The fact is what we have done is perfectly legal. We've done
exactly the same evidence accumulation process that the authorities go
through in accumulating evidence on every criminal in the U.S. of
America.
MATTINGLY: Last March the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the
Oregon verdict, saying unless an activist directly threatens violence
then what he or she publishes or posts on the Internet is protected as
free speech.
HORSLEY: We believe that the court decision will open the door to a
return to something like freedom to expression in the abortion debate.
MATTINGLY: Click to Horsley's site today and you see animation of
dripping blood, graphic photographs of aborted fetuses, writings from
Horsley justifying the deadly bombing of a Birmingham, Alabama abortion
clinic as "an act of war."
DR. WARREN HERN, ABORTION LAWSUIT PLAINTIFF: The general message from
the antiabortion movement is that they will accept any level of violence
to impose their will on others and to threaten us.
MATTINGLY: Dr. Warren Hern, whose name appears on the site, is among
hundreds whose names are listed by Horsley. Abortion doctors, clinic
owners and employees, in some cases even their spouses. But also:
judges, politicians, public officials, and celebrities. The names on
Horsley's lists range from Bill and Hillary Clinton to Janet Reno,
Everett Coop, and former senator Bob Dole, to Whoopi Goldberg, Jane
Fonda, and Mary Tyler Moore.
(on camera): And that's not all. Now there is something new, taking
advantage of popular Internet technology. Horsley is posting photographs
and video of people entering and leaving abortion clinics.
(voice-over): Horsley recruits protesters to become reporters and
photographers for his "Christian Gallery News Service,"
protected he says, by First Amendment freedom of the press. So far you
can view pictures taken outside clinics in 12 different states.
David Mattingly, CNN.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
VAN SUSTEREN: Joining me from Atlanta is the creator of the Nuremberg
files Web site, Neal Horsley.
Neal, why the video of people going in and out of abortion clinics? Why
do you have to do that?
HORSLEY: Well, why would the press cover any accident waiting to happen
if we knew that somebody was driving down the road with an occupant that
was fixing to be in a fatal accident, wouldn't we cover it as news?
That's what happens to a woman who goes to an abortion clinic. Her
occupant is going to be killed before she leaves.
VAN SUSTEREN: But Neal, the Supreme Court has said women can have
abortions, so are you not invading the privacy or at least almost trying
to incite something by putting this on the Internet?
HORSLEY: The fact that the Supreme Court has justified legalized murder
has nothing to do with the responsibility of the press to cover
newsworthy events, and it is news when human beings are slaughtered
legally in the United States.
VAN SUSTEREN: Are you saying you are a journalist, Neal? Is that what
you hold yourself out as?
HORSLEY: That's exactly what I am. I'm covering the news stories that
you should have been covering. If the press had been covering the
pictures of the babies who are being butchered in those abortion clinics
for the last 30 years, this abortion war would have been over a long
time ago.
VAN SUSTEREN: What are your personal feelings about some of the people
who are on your list what you have crossed out, people that have been
murdered?
HORSLEY: I think they are dead. I think they're examples of the fact
that the abortion war will cost the lives of many more than just the
millions of little babies who have been slaughtered unless we stop it in
the United States.
VAN SUSTEREN: What is your view of violence towards the people you have
put on your list on your Web site?
HORSLEY: My view is, nobody who is listed on my Web site has ever had
violence in any form at all.
VAN SUSTEREN: Well, what about the fact that some of the people on your
Web site, their names were on the Web site, and suddenly they get
crossed off after they were murdered? That indeed suggests there was...
HORSLEY: Nobody has been on my Web site before they were murdered. The
only people who are on my Web site now with the names crossed off were
added after they were killed. Nobody who has ever been attacked, who has
been listed on my Web site.
VAN SUSTEREN: OK, what is your positiion on violence towards people who
perform abortions?
HORSLEY: My position is that people who kill little babies are
responsible for a heinous act and we should not be surprised if people
rise up against them. That's why we have to legally stop legalized
abortion or assassination and terrorism will grow around us.
VAN SUSTEREN: Are you suggesting -- and let me get right back to my same
question: Are you for or against violence towards people who perform
abortions?
HORSLEY: I'm against death. But the fact is we are killing little
babies. People who slaughter innocent children put their lives at risk.
I don't care what the Supreme Court says or what the federal government
says, people who kill innocent babies are doing things that will incite
violence against themselves and that has nothing to do with anything
Neal Horsley says.
VAN SUSTEREN: OK, Stephanie Mueller is on your Web site, is she not?
HORSLEY: Yes.
VAN SUSTEREN: Why is she on?
HORSLEY: Because she is involved in some capacity with perpetuating
legalized abortion.
VAN SUSTEREN: What capacity?
HORSLEY: I'm not sure.
VAN SUSTEREN: How did you get her name?
HORSLEY: People who I trust around the country, have given me the names
of everybody that is on there and identified why. I think Mueller
probably works for one of the abortion organizations.
VAN SUSTEREN: So you are willing to put people at risk on a Web site
that has at least stirred some controversy when you yourself can't even
vouch for why the person is on your Web site.
HORSLEY: I can vouch for the fact that she is in some way a figure in
perpetuating legalized abortion or she wouldn't be there. There are
several hundred people's names on the list. I did not make it my policy
to memorize the resume of everyone there.
VAN SUSTEREN: All right, my thanks to Neal Horsley in Atlanta.
__________________
Now, for the other side of this passionate debate.
Joining me here in Washington is Stephanie Mueller, the director of
public policy for the National Abortion Federation, an organization that
represents abortion providers in the U.S. and Canada.
Stephanie, do you know why you are on this list and what's it like to be
on that list?
STEPHANIE MUELLER, NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: Well, I do believe I am
on that list, because I support a woman's right to choose. And
unfortunately a number of people who support a woman's right to obtain
legal health care services on are that Web site. I'm obviously very
concerned.
But I'm also concerned for the dedicated health care professionals who
daily go in and provide safe reproductive health care services to women.
VAN SUSTEREN: But Neal says that none of the people on his list, because
they were on the list, were subsequently murdered, that it was after the
fact that he put them on the list.
MUELLER: Well, actually that's not quite true, because we do have a
physician who was listed on the site and was attacked last summer. So
that's actually not a correct fact.
And also we have other physicians who have received death threats after
being posted on the Web site. You also have from the Portland trial the
testimony of physicians like Dr. Warren Hern who had to wear bulletproof
vests and engage in additional security precautions after being placed
on the Web site. We feel this really is encouraging violence against
abortion providers.
VAN SUSTEREN: What do you make of the fact, though, the case that you're
talking about in Portland involving Neil, went up to the United States
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, and that court sided with Neil.
MUELLER: Well, we do feel that ultimately, our side will prevail and
that the judges will find that this represents treats against abortion
providers. It's interesting, in that Portland case, the jury was...
examined all of the evidence and did find that this constituted a threat;
and even in their decision in the court of appeals, the judges wrote
that they did believe that providing addresses of physicians did make it
easier for extremists to target abortion providers for violence.
VAN SUSTEREN: But the problem is that the court said that the site could
still exist, that it was First Amendment, and Neil was allowed to do it,
whether or not you like it or not, that Neil could do it.
MUELLER: That's true, and in fact, the National Abortion Federation has
been working for some time to contact Internet service providers. We
believe that contacting them and educating them about this site will
result in it being pulled down, and in fact, almost all of the sites we
have contacted have pulled the site down once they have looked at it.
VAN SUSTEREN: But you know, the funny thing is, Stephanie, is that I got
on
it today, my whole staff got on it today, we looked at it, David
Mattingly got on it today -- people can get on it, this is the Internet.
MUELLER: Unfortunately, there are always Internet service providers out
there for Mr. Horsley to go to, but we will continue in our efforts,
both by supporting the appeal of the 9th Circuit decision and also
contacting the Internet service providers.
VAN SUSTEREN: What is the status of the litigation that came out of the
United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit? Do you take it on?
MUELLER: Well, it's being petitioned right now for (UNINTELLIGIBLE)
reception, so we are still waiting to hear about that, and obviously we
support that and hope that that will be successful.
VAN SUSTEREN: Has the violence toward abortion providers and toward
clinics sort of subsided? I haven't seen much of it lately in the news.
MUELLER: Well, we have had a slight decrease in extreme violence, but
obviously we did have the murder of Dr. Bart Slepian not very long ago,
and we've also had a continuation in other forms of harassing and
violent activity, so we continue to be very concerned, and obviously we
will continue to look out for our providers to make sure that they are
protected.
VAN SUSTEREN: Give me an example of the kind of harassment that people
now receive?
MUELLER: Well, it can vary obviously, but on a day-to-day basis, we have
providers who will receive death threats, we have providers whose
children have been followed to school. The information on this Web site
makes it very easy for extremists to target these providers for daily
harassment and intimidation.
VAN SUSTEREN: Can you actually link Neil's Web site to any particular
violence?
MUELLER: It's hard to say. We do believe that it is a blatant invitation
to intimidation and harassment, and we also believe that it is providing
a tool to an extremist who does want to take violence into their own
hands, so we obviously feel very strongly that it needs to come down.
VAN SUSTEREN: All right. My thanks to you, Stephanie Mueller.
MUELLER: Thank you.
END TRANSCRIPT
|